Trinity Large Thinking is 57.1× cheaper per million tokens (blended). Claude Fable 5 has the larger context window (1,000,000 vs 262,144 tokens, 3.8×). Trinity Large Thinking is open-weights; the other is not.

Claude Fable 5 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Live catalog fields. Best-in-row is highlighted.

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic · anthropic__claude-fable-5

Trinity Large Thinkingopen

Arcee Ai · arcee-ai__trinity-large-thinking

Identity

Fieldanthropic__claude-fable-5arcee-ai__trinity-large-thinking
ProviderAnthropicArcee Ai
Sluganthropic__claude-fable-5arcee-ai__trinity-large-thinking
Statuslivelive
Open weightsNoYes
License
HuggingFacearcee-ai/Trinity-Large-Thinking

Quality

Fieldanthropic__claude-fable-5arcee-ai__trinity-large-thinking
Quality index (0–100)89.4

Cost

Fieldanthropic__claude-fable-5arcee-ai__trinity-large-thinking
Input $ / 1M tokens$10.00$0.25
Cached input $ / 1M$1.00$0.06
Output $ / 1M tokens$50.00$0.80

Context

Fieldanthropic__claude-fable-5arcee-ai__trinity-large-thinking
Max context tokens1,000,000262,144
Max output tokens128,00080,000

Modalities

Fieldanthropic__claude-fable-5arcee-ai__trinity-large-thinking
Inputtext, image, filetext
Outputtexttext